3 ms·
another such beauty http://hg.icculus.org/icculus/lugaru/file/97b303e79826/Source/GameTick.cpp#l7276 http://hg.icculus.org/icculus/lugaru/file/97b303e79826/Sou
by damptowel 10y ago
another such beauty
http://hg.icculus.org/icculus/lugaru/file/97b303e79826/Source/GameTick.cpp#l7276 http://hg.icculus.org/icculus/lugaru/file/97b303e79826/Sourc...
- zubspace 10y agoWow. Question regarding index access: There are tons of for loops with player[k] occurrences and similar. Personally I would create a local variable and prevent further index-retrievals. Is this worthwhile or would a compiler optimize the array-index access away? Or maybe subsequent uses of the same index are cached by the cpu? Does someone know?
- tehrei 10y agoThat's a micro-optimisation that's absolutely worthless. Even if you do pay the cost of indexing an array every single time, that's just a single instruction to fetch the address. The compiler is absolutely capable of caching the indexing for you, either in a register or on the stack, if it deems it worthwhile. One reason you might want to use a separate variable would be to prevent indexing mistakes, like using i instead of k by mistake in a context where i is a nested loop's counter. But apart from this and other "to make it easier on the human" reasons, there's no point in caching that in a variable. Now, if you were writing Python on the other hand...
- ensiferum 10y agoHoly batman. Now this is officially the worst piece of code I've ever seen in my 15 years of programming. This has to be generated... right?? I can't believe any human wrote this. Grabs the eye bleach
- webkike 10y agoIt was written by a highschooler who made a 3D video game with decent physics and you're... criticizing him? Man, I'd like to see what YOU wrote in highschool.