5 ms·
Google most certainly does not fall into the former. Google has had multiple security incidents during the lifetime of the company that resulted in an increasi
by rrdharan 10y ago
Google most certainly does not fall into the former.
Google has had multiple security incidents during the lifetime of the company that resulted in an increasing investment in upping their security profile. Operation Aurora (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Aurora https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Aurora) was one of them (which of course bit a number of companies and was quite a sophisticated attack), but they have had other screwups, like the SRE spying incident (http://gawker.com/5637234/gcreep-google-engineer-stalked-teens-spied-on-chats http://gawker.com/5637234/gcreep-google-engineer-stalked-tee...) and others.
For Dropbox, the password incident did result in major and serious change; it was a turning point resulting in significant investment in product and infrastructure security. In my admittedly biased opinion Dropbox now has one of the best security teams out there. For example the product security team invests heavily in the XSS protections on Dropbox's website that are top of class, and stronger than those on many of Google's own first party properties (I'll demur on details here at the risk of likely violating one or more NDAs, but I encourage you to read https://blogs.dropbox.com/tech/category/security/ https://blogs.dropbox.com/tech/category/security/).
Source: I've worked as a software engineer at both Google and Dropbox and I'm reasonably familiar with engineering, infrastructure/operational and physical security practices at both organizations.
- sneak 10y agoWill you run the closed-source Dropbox kext on your machine?
- flyt 10y agoI will. My system runs lots of closed source code already.
- superobserver 10y agoDo you suppose it matters when someone unapologetically extends their unbidden shill-like opinion favoring a more current employer? Running closed source code clearly involves a level of trust that permits abiding ignorance. Nothing more to say then.
- dang 10y agoI'm not sure what this means, but if by "unbidden shill-like opinion" you mean to insinuate astroturfing by another commenter, that's not allowed on HN without evidence. An opposing opinion is not evidence.
- superobserver 10y agoFor one, this was in regards to the parent being a response to its parent, which was unrelated to other parents. Second, I was attempting to make a generalized assessment that no one should particularly care about a prior/current/whatever employee's opinion, precisely because it is sorely lacking in technical details that matter. (In other words, it was an argument from authority - a fallacy.) Perhaps I triggered the wrong idea with "shill-like" but I'll take the down vote for that with pride. Cheers (and keep up the great mod work)!