You know the post is bad when the second paragraph is: First of all, it's inevitable but I still hate dramatic headlines, even though I write like this

You know the post is bad when the second paragraph is: First of all, it's inevitable but I still hate dramatic headlines, even though I write like this myself sometimes. "My time with Rails is up" like it's saying "And you should leave Rails now too if you're smart". I dismissed the article entirely because of that. I was about to post a counter-rant to that without reading it properly, but now that I have, I wrote this new article from scratch. How can someone admit that he started writing a counter-rant without reading the original post? I know he said he changed and started from scratch but if someone admits something like this you can't expect something good afterwards. This might explain why the rest of the post is just he spiting random stuff to pretend anything there makes sense. If you go over other posts in that blog you will notice the same pattern: spit random (and most of the time wrong) stuff in an attempt that something will make sense (which never does).