3 ms·
The point @putzdown is making is not that the OP has many typos, etc., but rather that the article is incoherent babble with no structure, no point, and no evid
by mangeletti 10y ago
The point @putzdown is making is not that the OP has many typos, etc., but rather that the article is incoherent babble with no structure, no point, and no evidence to support its non-point.
If Akita had written:
Sometimes, tools and frameworks, like
Wordpress and Rails, respectively, gain
enough traction that their monopoly
economies of scale keep them afloat
long after their value sunsets.
That would have sufficed.
- putzdown 10y agoPrecisely. It would have sufficed, and it would have been an unremarkable reaffirmation of the sad reality that yes, widespread habits trump merit in many cases (Betamax vs VHS etc etc). It's not clear what he said, but if all he said was, "Sure Rails stinks but the majority uses it so suck it up," I don't think it'd be an article worth applauding.