> In my conclusion I mention why there are no benchmarks, it's nearly impossible to construct a realistic comparison between the two techniques. You "mention"

> In my conclusion I mention why there are no benchmarks, it's nearly impossible to construct a realistic comparison between the two techniques. You "mention" this as if it were fact, yes. Apparently you are not aware of realistic comparisons that do exist, such as http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mckinley/papers/mmtk-sigmetrics-2004.pdf http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mckinley/papers/mmtk-sigmetri... (Alternatively, the article needs a discussion of why you think this is not a "realistic comparison".)