So in summary: it's great because it makes more money. The implication that this leads to a better movie offering is dubious. Would you say better movies are c

So in summary: it's great because it makes more money. The implication that this leads to a better movie offering is dubious. Would you say better movies are coming out now than 10/20 years ago? Even if more movies are coming (which I would find very easy to believe), I doubt (as in: I'd need to see some evidence) it's a consequence of digital distribution rights. The tomato example is also bogus. Yes it's inefficient if this restriction does not have a raison d'être. But (completely) free markets do not magically create a societal optimal.