6 ms·
Is it me, or is every CSS framework nowadays advertised as being either 'light,' 'responsive,' or 'modern?' http://danmalarkey.github.io/schema/ http://danmala
by unsignedqword 10y ago
Is it me, or is every CSS framework nowadays advertised as being either 'light,' 'responsive,' or 'modern?'
http://danmalarkey.github.io/schema/ http://danmalarkey.github.io/schema/
http://responsivebp.com/ http://responsivebp.com/
http://getbase.org/ http://getbase.org/
http://getskeleton.com/ http://getskeleton.com/
https://www.myresponsee.com/ https://www.myresponsee.com/
http://html5-ninja.com/icecream/ http://html5-ninja.com/icecream/
http://www.fitgrd.com/ http://www.fitgrd.com/
http://lightuikit.in/ http://lightuikit.in/
http://bulma.io/ http://bulma.io/
- pawelduda 10y agoJust like every new shiny tool that pops up - everything is 'robust', 'scalable', easy 'to reason about'. What a time to be alive.
- snaky 10y agoWe are still in Wild West of shiny open-source frameworks, libraries and tools. As time goes by, a niche markets and more sophisticated marketing strategies evolve. "Clojure library for 18-35 whites living in suburbs" would become a common then.
- cakoose 10y agoI think "responsive" is a useful modifier (even though most CSS frameworks nowadays are responsive). "Light" is definitely relative but at least they list the exact size pretty early on. "Modern", however, is something everybody seems to use to describe their programming framework/library and it's useless. Think about it this way: if you removed the word "modern", what information have you lost?
- _up 10y agoI would say "Modern" means that it's needs a recent Browser to work correct. Users with Browsers older than 2 years are probably not supported.