> Maybe it's time for an alternative to ISO C: a safe C with more behaviors pinned down. There was a proposal for such alternative [1], which was abandoned lat

> Maybe it's time for an alternative to ISO C: a safe C with more behaviors pinned down. There was a proposal for such alternative [1], which was abandoned later [2] due to the difficulty to get a single set of limitations that everybody would expect. [1] http://blog.regehr.org/archives/1180 http://blog.regehr.org/archives/1180 [2] http://blog.regehr.org/archives/1287 http://blog.regehr.org/archives/1287