3 ms·

Are you refering to the following issue? https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941 https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941

• duncan_bayne 10y ago
  Yup. I believe GitHub's hiring of her constitutes a tacit endorsement of that behaviour.
  • ceejayoz 10y ago
    Which is a bit ironic, given your strongly arguing in https://github.com/ContributorCovenant/contributor_covenant/pull/74 https://github.com/ContributorCovenant/contributor_covenant/... that a user's outside-of-project behavior shouldn't impact that project at all.
    • duncan_bayne 10y ago
      Except that in this case, she is being hired in part because of her Social Justice advocacy. At least I assume so, & GitHub hasn't exactly been forthcoming on the matter.
      • ceejayoz 10y ago
        "At least I assume so" Like some might assume a project's core contributor's behavior is known of and condoned by the project, perhaps?
        • duncan_bayne 10y ago
          Sure. But in this case, it's highly relevant. She's not being hired _despite_ political activity that's irrelevant to the project, she's being hired _because_ of it. That makes the hiring itself an endorsement of the behaviour.
          • dang 10y ago
            Please stop. This is already way off topic, and making it about a specific person takes it into vendetta territory, which is far from the kind of discussion we want here.
            • duncan_bayne 10y ago
              Sure; I disagree, but it's both rude and pointless arguing topicality with a mod :)