4 ms·
>> If everyone has [list of services] then large rights holders extract more money. > It's the content creators driving this. You're agreeing with the post yo
by khedoros 10y ago
>> If everyone has [list of services] then large rights holders extract more money.
> It's the content creators driving this.
You're agreeing with the post you replied to.
- rayiner 10y agoMy reading of his argument is that it's a conspiracy between Netflix, Hulu, etc, to make more money for themselves. They're not the rights holders.
- khedoros 10y ago> They're not the rights holders. I understand it, and I'm not sure why you felt the need to state it. > My reading of his argument is that it's a conspiracy between Netflix, Hulu, etc, to make more money for themselves. I was trying to find a nice way to say "I think that you read the argument wrong". darpa_escapee's argument is about a conspiracy of content owners. The conspiracy that they're talking about is spreading content from the major providers across as many distribution channels as possible, so that one would have to subscribe to half a dozen services to get access to all the media produced by a particular content owner, for example.
- darpa_escapee 10y agoSorry if I wasn't clear. khederos clarified my argument well. Netflix is at the behest of the rights holders who want to collect licensing fees from as many customers as possible. One way to do that is to divide their content catalogs among many different services.