5 ms·
That's interesting. I always interpret it to be 99.9% of the population on a given surface. It could be read as types also I guess. EDIT: the article posted he
by alexandros 17y ago
That's interesting. I always interpret it to be 99.9% of the population on a given surface. It could be read as types also I guess.
EDIT: the article posted here http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1031922 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1031922 seems to support the 'types' theory, although it also casts significant doubt on the validity of the claims.