4 ms·
Really depends on the use case. If you're trying to do streaming, spark will introduce some latency because it's based on micro-batching. Flink and Storm are be
by capkutay 10y ago
Really depends on the use case. If you're trying to do streaming, spark will introduce some latency because it's based on micro-batching. Flink and Storm are better for low-latency scenarios.
- faizshah 10y agoI agree that Flink is better for low latency, but I was also under the impression Flink's DataSet API was faster for batch processing than Spark. Now that they're purporting Spark 2.0 may be up to 10x faster than 1.6 I'll have to take another look.