The funny thing is that even the first article you linked to was published on 3/26/2008. Just after being acquired by TATA. > well, you can do googling all day

The funny thing is that even the first article you linked to was published on 3/26/2008. Just after being acquired by TATA. > well, you can do googling all day and spitting out all those craps about TATA, nothing is going to come out of this, moreover this discussion will fan out to other unrelated topic. That's precisely what you just did: "googling all day and spitting out all those craps about TATA". You made a stupid point about TATA not selling it's cars in any country other than India's neighbors and asked me to prove you otherwise. When I called you out on that, you now on the back-foot and instead talk about the "crappiness" of the car and the temporary "declining" sales in the US. You talk about "hilariously being on the verge of another bail out" but I can link you to a more recent article (5 Jan 2016) on Jaguar Land Rover sales picking up in the US by 30%: http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2016/01/05/jaguar-land-rover/78315742/ http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2016/01/05/jaguar-l... The real issue is that you just choose to use outdated links that fit your discourse.