3 ms·
> None of what you said is backed by science, There is nothing out there to disprove what people fearfully claim either. The long term effects on a large were
by nashashmi 10y ago
> None of what you said is backed by science,
There is nothing out there to disprove what people fearfully claim either. The long term effects on a large were never tested, and it is being tested while in production. Unfortunately, there is no control case to compare against.
>and people had allergies long before GMO crops ever existed.
Sure there were people with allergies long before GMOs but they were in smaller numbers.
There has been a growing trend of abnormalities and scientists cannot understand why. GMOs cannot be ruled out.
- partiallypro 10y ago> There is nothing out there to disprove what people fearfully claim either. That's not how burden of proof works. > Sure there were people with allergies long before GMOs but they were in smaller numbers. Besides the fact that you've made this assertion based on no data what so ever, even if the data existed from the 1800s it's unlikely it would be that good as most people would just not report it and had no access to medical treatment. > There has been a growing trend of abnormalities and scientists cannot understand why. Such as?
- pg_is_a_butt 10y agothe burden for stating personal opinions? i didn't realize free speech was abolished and we're all burdened now. you're an idiot.