3 ms·
That's all milk though, and be sure you look at the unsweetened data. A 16oz, Ice Coffee (which is what I prefer so that's what I'm posting), is a mere 5 calor
by epimetheus 10y ago
That's all milk though, and be sure you look at the unsweetened data.
A 16oz, Ice Coffee (which is what I prefer so that's what I'm posting), is a mere 5 calories[0] - drip coffee with no sweetener or splenda or some other low/no calorie sweetener would be the same.
[0] - http://www.starbucks.com/menu/drinks/iced-coffee/iced-coffee?foodZone=9999#size=106510&sweetened=0 http://www.starbucks.com/menu/drinks/iced-coffee/iced-coffee...
- will_brown 10y agoI acknowledged that in my original post: >Second, unless coffee is black it is probably far from zero calories, with dairy and sugar maybe between 200-300 [empty] Notwithstanding the fact that you and I tend to drink coffee black, we likely are in the minority. The fact that starbucks beverages are over 200 calories at a ratio of 5:1 tend to support my assumptions about the demands of the market (based on a sample of 51 starbucks beverages). I think a lot of people took issue with my figures (200-300), but they are starbucks figures not mine. Still my point remains, even if an average coffee is 120 calories a number others have conceded who otherwise said I grossly exaggerated, I wouldn't consider that skipping breakfast insofar as one can have a very nutritious breakfast for that amount of calories (say 1 whole egg and 2-3 egg whites; even bacon and an egg).