5 ms·
If it's clearly against previous precedent, they wouldn't prosecute, that just wastes their resources.
by ikeboy 10y ago
If it's clearly against previous precedent, they wouldn't prosecute, that just wastes their resources.
- jonknee 10y agoIn theory, but that's not a theory I'd like to test personally. In cases that they do bring it frequently comes down to arguments about who received benefit. Sometimes it's as little as status/friendship.
- ikeboy 10y agoNot since Newman, which explicitly found that a friendship is not enough.