Let me counter: I found the article very readable, engaging and informative. There's a lot of context in there that the top-rated summary above misses (who the

Let me counter: I found the article very readable, engaging and informative. There's a lot of context in there that the top-rated summary above misses (who the researcher is, and what he's worked on, how allergy theories have changed over the years...) It would have helped to have an abstract, but that's not a failure of the article itself.