3 ms·
It's in the linked review[0] that he wrote, and the subsequent follow up by the developer[1]. [0] http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/05/09/stellaris-review http:
by wastedhours 10y ago
It's in the linked review[0] that he wrote, and the subsequent follow up by the developer[1].
[0] http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/05/09/stellaris-review http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/05/09/stellaris-review
[1] http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1solvon http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1solvon
- jsnell 10y agoIt'd be really strange for any publication to claim their reviews are "objective" (there's objectivegamereviews.com, but it is intended as humor). The usual view is something along the lines of a review being just an indication of one person's experience with a game at a specific time. And as far as I can see, the latter is the case here as well. Neither page you link to contains the word "objective". The only mention of the words "bad" is in the phrase "bad luck", in a sentence specifically talking about how other people might have a better experience and Rowan might have been just unlucky. There is a score, but to interpret that you'd look at the review guidelines for IGN. To quote: Under no circumstances are review scores influenced by anything other than _our own opinions_ on the quality of the product in question. (Emphasis mine).
- pjc50 10y agoNeither of which contain the word "objective", and the second one says "lower than liked score" and "opinion".