4 ms·
To what extent does this suggest to you that when we first develop strong AI, we won't know it?
by Trill-I-Am 10y ago
To what extent does this suggest to you that when we first develop strong AI, we won't know it?
- Atwood 10y agoExcellent point. It seems to me that there is a very good chance that by judging it by our own ab/de/inductive metrics we could miss its blossoming. Your own two cents?
- unabst 10y agoEngineering requires understanding. If we're randomly mixing potions then we may get a result without any understanding, but there's a name for that, and it's called magic. Strong AI will most certainly appear magical, but any technology with this level of sophistication will require focused, intentional, intelligent effort. The person who accomplishes it will know exactly what they were doing. This mystical emergence of intelligence is also somewhat metaphysical and unscientific. There are no ghosts in shells, and intelligence doesn't just rise from bare metal. If we were to ask if someone could invent bitcoin and not know it, it'd be a joke. Yet, with AI, there are those who still intuitively argue for some form of emergence. But across the board, these claims are made with little or no understanding of what underlies physical intelligence.
- unabst 10y agoIf anyone has evidence of a scientific counterargument, please share. The bean sprout AI myth needs busting.