3 ms·
Couldn't you use manual tracking at first? The steadiness of the tracking isn't so important if every individual exposure is short, and most cameras have a cont
by mrob 10y ago
Couldn't you use manual tracking at first? The steadiness of the tracking isn't so important if every individual exposure is short, and most cameras have a continuous mode so you can take many thousands of photographs. I've successfully stacked hand-held photos using Hugin:
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/ http://hugin.sourceforge.net/
You will probably need a camera with raw support for this to work, because each individual exposure will be extremely noisy, and any in-camera noise reduction will destroy too much detail. You will probably also need at least two bright stars in frame for alignment to work.
And if you have a huge number of images you can also keep only those with low atmospheric distortion:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucky_imaging https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucky_imaging
The same principle could be used to keep only those images with little tracking-induced motion blur.
- _ph_ 10y agoThat could work - and I am a strong believer to try everything, even if the equipment at hand is not "officially capable" of doing the task. If one does that in the proper spirit of experimentation, this is great and you learn a lot and can have tons of fun. People who have no astronomy experience might though think that you can just take photos as you see them in the web or in magazines.