3 ms·
Sure here are two (you may have to follow some links to go to the actual publications): Speech to text: https://developer.ibm.com/watson/blog/2016/04/28/recent
by pesenti 10y ago
Sure here are two (you may have to follow some links to go to the actual publications):
Speech to text: https://developer.ibm.com/watson/blog/2016/04/28/recent-advances-in-conversational-speech-recognition-2/ https://developer.ibm.com/watson/blog/2016/04/28/recent-adva...
Emotion: https://developer.ibm.com/watson/blog/2016/02/29/another-step-closer-to-building-empathetic-systems/ https://developer.ibm.com/watson/blog/2016/02/29/another-ste...
- dr_zoidberg 10y agoIn my experience, Speech to text has been a huge disapointment. I do give you that in the country where I live (Argentina) we speak a different... "dialect" of Spanish that what you've probably used to train your engine. Even then, it's entirely useless for my country, whereas Google has zero problems.
- pesenti 10y agoVery fair point. Our STT service, even though it is based on a technology with the very best results for public benchmarks, is not as robust to accents at the moment - for the exact reason you mention, we didn't train it on all the dialects. But that will come with usage in the field. Google has a head start on this but with the usage of our services growing quickly we will be able to catch up quickly.