4 ms·
> given that we now have programs that look at a photograph and say "Women wearing a hat, sitting on a bar stool and drinking wine" That may be; but then there
by discardorama 10y ago
> given that we now have programs that look at a photograph and say "Women wearing a hat, sitting on a bar stool and drinking wine"
That may be; but then there's also this: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.1897 http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.1897
- drcode 10y agoWell, personally I think you could perform those exact same attacks against the human brain, but in the case of NNs it's much easier to do simply because computer algos allow for exact repeatable experiments.
- taneq 10y agoSo? Any generalizing learning algorithm necessarily accepts a large number of inputs (including some unintended ones) for each possible output. Humans are no more robust against this kind of attack than any other system - consider stage magic, confidence scams, NLP, optical illusions, etc. If you want a truly infallible system, then no, AI will never provide that. What you want is a magic deity.