2 ms·
It's not a treaty. It is the treaty. And treaties don't "just follow" because there is already a treaty on a similar topic already in place. The time to sign s
by kchoudhu 10y ago
It's not a treaty. It is the treaty. And treaties don't "just follow" because there is already a treaty on a similar topic already in place.
The time to sign such an agreement on interlinking would have been before breaking ground on the interlinking project. To demand an agreement afterwards is to negotiate in bad faith.
- shripadk 10y agoNo the existing treaty is only for a single region. The Interlink project is much greater and broader in scope and the same treaty cannot be applied to the interlink project. It's ridiculous to think that a small water treaty signed in 1996 can have a scope to cover a project as huge as the Interlink. New treaty/agreement has to be signed and will be done by India in the best interests of Bangladesh.