3 ms·
Seems to me that a large section of the population is already at this point without AI. The other weakness of this argument is that in order to perform many of
by andrewclunn 10y ago
Seems to me that a large section of the population is already at this point without AI. The other weakness of this argument is that in order to perform many of the human jobs, the AI will need a robotic body. Human labor will easily win on cost for many of those jobs.
- mac01021 10y ago> a large section of the population is already at this point without AI. Which section? Just about any able-bodied person can create enough value to feed/house themselves by washing dishes, stocking shelves, mopping floors, staring at security camera monitors, etc. > Human labor will easily win on cost for many of those jobs. A human will not work a job that doesn't pay their cost of living (or if they do it won't be for very long because that's not sustainable). If that means $20k per year, then I would guess robots will have no problem competing on cost. When the software is ready, anyway. Probably not within 10 years.