3 ms·
To start, we have "fixed" type parameter application syntax. (Most people see this as a win and now matches Haskell IIRC). Some have requested ability for type
by jordwalke 10y ago
To start, we have "fixed" type parameter application syntax. (Most people see this as a win and now matches Haskell IIRC). Some have requested ability for type annotation ayntax to be above the value it annotates.
- eru 10y agoBy the way, do you even need to work towards _one_ better syntax? Seems like you should be able to support mostly whatever syntax the user wants? (Within reason.)