3 ms·
I'd be happy to chip in $1k to help the legal fees of creating such a standard clause. In CA, there's the protection of http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displ
by fizx 17y ago
I'd be happy to chip in $1k to help the legal fees of creating such a standard clause. In CA, there's the protection of http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=lab&group=02001-03000&file=2870-2872 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=lab... , but the burden of proof is on the employee.
I'd love to see a way to make this more employee-favoring.
- pjonesdotca 17y agoThanks for this. It is actually in Canada where I live so this applies to me.
- pasbesoin 17y agoTo clarify, the grandparent's link refers to California, not Canada. Official California Legislative Information http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/ http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/
- pjonesdotca 17y agoSo I figured out much later. slaps hand to head. But, thanks because it does give an idea towards a clause.