3 ms·
> "Hey, you know, Facebook isn't obligated to publish anything." Who is claiming otherwise? I see this form of argument pop up whenever a corporation censors
by Crito 10y ago
> "Hey, you know, Facebook isn't obligated to publish anything."
Who is claiming otherwise?
I see this form of argument pop up whenever a corporation censors somebody, but I rarely see anybody actually claiming some sort of obligation exists.
Criticizing a corporation for doing something that they are legally allowed to do is... not exactly unprecedented.
- walrus01 10y agoIf you're not paying money to publish content on somebody else's httpd, and have no contractual relationship with them for services, you have very little recourse if the publishing platform suddenly disappears for any reason. Business failure, server failure, corporate censorship/policies, whatever.
- Crito 10y ago> "If you're not paying money to publish content on somebody else's httpd, and have no contractual relationship with them for services, you have very little recourse if the publishing platform suddenly disappears for any reason." Again, I don't see anybody claiming otherwise.
- hackney 10y agoAm I the only one here who thinks facebook's content is pure garbage? Really, what is the point of the world's biggest social networking platform worried about misc. BS posts? Right, no offense, it's pure garbage to begin with, imho.
- Crito 10y agoI don't disagree with you, but I also don't see what your comment has to do with mine.