Another article formed on a completely baseless assumption. >as a weapon of war, the flail is not a good design. The fact that its not a good design does not

Another article formed on a completely baseless assumption. >as a weapon of war, the flail is not a good design. The fact that its not a good design does not mean that it didn't exist. The world is filled with things that actually exist, today, that are terribly designed. A careful study of history will likely turn up more things that are terribly designed then things that are well designed. Its amazing anyone would contend, "it couldn't have existed, because it was a bad design". Just what society did this author grow up in?