4 ms·
possibly because GM failed to market in a package that was more appealing? It should have been in CUV form or at least that by the second version they should ha
by Shivetya 10y ago
possibly because GM failed to market in a package that was more appealing? It should have been in CUV form or at least that by the second version they should have had both forms. You had to be a diehard fan of the ideology behind the car to suffer that dash and such of gen1.
The real test comes when the Bolt arrives. How will be people weigh the difference of 150 miles of EV range to have a range extender? Will that 150 mile gap be too high for the Volt to compete with or will how space is used and packaging matter (CUV vs small sedan)?
While I think they had a good idea in a two door version the ELR was so silly over priced (gen 2 of it was as bad or worse for reusing gen 1 tech even after gen 2 volt was selling) that it was a failure before it shipped. Chevy should had the two door as well as small CUV form. Cover all bases, same frame, just different bodies. (think Cruze).