3 ms·
Piggy backing off your comment to share these two great contrasting articles on maintaining wealth. First the Vanderbilts (who lost it all) http://www.forbes.c
by billmalarky 10y ago
Piggy backing off your comment to share these two great contrasting articles on maintaining wealth.
First the Vanderbilts (who lost it all)
http://www.forbes.com/sites/natalierobehmed/2014/07/14/the-vanderbilts-how-american-royalty-lost-their-crown-jewels/#1dcb7585e196 http://www.forbes.com/sites/natalierobehmed/2014/07/14/the-v...
Then the Mellons (who have never been richer)
http://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2014/07/08/175-years-later-the-mellons-have-never-been-richer-howd-they-do-it/#7d3ab1272d0b http://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2014/07/08/175-years-...
Probably my favorite series of work from Forbes.
- kens 10y agoGloria Vanderbilt has an estimated $200 million, so I wouldn't say the Vanderbilts lost it all. Rather than 3 generations shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves, it's more like 5 generations from America's richest to merely very rich. Alfred Vanderbilt was less fortunate. He decided not to take the Titanic at the last minute, but 3 years later was on the Lusitania when it was torpedoed. Despite not knowing how to swim, he gave his life jacket to a young mother and died. (This is an interesting counterpoint to yesterday's article "Does power really corrupt" about how the rich are less caring.)