4 ms·

Word is around. From what I see, the information on the trees has apparently been known for a decent amount of time. Per this: http://www.escarpment.org/_files

Word is around. From what I see, the information on the trees has apparently been known for a decent amount of time. Per this: http://www.escarpment.org/_files/file.php?fileid=fileQZNQsAzXRF&filename=file_2_kelly.pdf http://www.escarpment.org/_files/file.php?fileid=fileQZNQsAz... Research on this began in 1989, quite a long time ago. So there's been a lot of awareness for a while. Most of the web pages on Niagara Escarpment nature activities already mentions this old forest (one example is here: http://brucetrail.org/pages/about-us/the-niagara-escarpment http://brucetrail.org/pages/about-us/the-niagara-escarpment). However, you are right to worry -- apparently in this case the worry is that this area gets a lot of rock climbers, and there does seem to be a significant concern about rock climbing's impact on the trees (and other fauna). Yes, some actions are being done to protect them too. This article goes into some of the detail. http://www.thespec.com/news-story/2249972-loving-it-to-death/ http://www.thespec.com/news-story/2249972-loving-it-to-death...

dragonwriter 10y ago
> there does seem to be a significant concern about rock climbing's impact on the trees (and other fauna). Nitpick, but trees are flora, not fauna, so that parenthetical should probably be stated differently, perhas as either "(and other flora)" or "(and fauna)".
- soundwave106 10y ago
  Hmm, maybe "(and other biota)" might be the best phrase. One of the concerns was the impact on lichen for instance; I think lichen is neither considered flora or fauna.
baudehlo 10y ago
Rock climbers in Ontario tend to be taught quite well in their training about the environment. At least I was. We tend to be quite strict about it to the point of instructing others if their actions are having a negative impact on the environment. It requires some education but that's one thing Canadians tend to be good at. Though I won't deny we have some gung-ho climbers who don't care. Those guys tend to be shunned by the climbing community and are the kinds of people who have and cause accidents.
- senorprogrammer 10y ago
  Just wanted to second this. When I climbed in Ontario, the cedars were pretty common knowledge and avoiding them at all costs was one of the tenets of being a good climber. Like any group, undoubtedly there's people who don't care; my experience was that most did.

dragonwriter 10y ago

> there does seem to be a significant concern about rock climbing's impact on the trees (and other fauna). Nitpick, but trees are flora, not fauna, so that parenthetical should probably be stated differently, perhas as either "(and other flora)" or "(and fauna)".

soundwave106 10y ago
Hmm, maybe "(and other biota)" might be the best phrase. One of the concerns was the impact on lichen for instance; I think lichen is neither considered flora or fauna.

baudehlo 10y ago

Rock climbers in Ontario tend to be taught quite well in their training about the environment. At least I was. We tend to be quite strict about it to the point of instructing others if their actions are having a negative impact on the environment. It requires some education but that's one thing Canadians tend to be good at. Though I won't deny we have some gung-ho climbers who don't care. Those guys tend to be shunned by the climbing community and are the kinds of people who have and cause accidents.

senorprogrammer 10y ago
Just wanted to second this. When I climbed in Ontario, the cedars were pretty common knowledge and avoiding them at all costs was one of the tenets of being a good climber. Like any group, undoubtedly there's people who don't care; my experience was that most did.