I would disagree on that declaring code is not code. If I declare my api uses a GET to /user/:id to get a user, does that interfere with someones copyright t

I would disagree on that declaring code is not code. If I declare my api uses a GET to /user/:id to get a user, does that interfere with someones copyright that has an api that uses a GET to /user/:id to get a user (everyone I think)? This is just a declaration. The actual code is buried in the methods and means that actually GET the user. This is not quite what is going on with this trial, but it's a very simplistic version. If we can't use the same declared API end points, then it will be much worse than patent trolls. Tim