3 ms·
Google is trying to make the case that interfaces aren't 'code' here. That's the entire case here, right?
by return0 10y ago
Google is trying to make the case that interfaces aren't 'code' here. That's the entire case here, right?
- raphman_ 10y agoYes. I just wanted to clarify that code that "compiles to nothing", e.g., build instructions, may still be copyrightable. Therefore, I do not think that Page wanted to extend his definition of "non-code" to anything besides interfaces/declarations.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- sambe 10y agoNo. Previous case already found APIs can be copyrighted. This one is about fair use. Unless that claim about interfaces becomes crucial in some unforeseen way.