4 ms·
The problem with that solution is, at least in my experience, that it doesn't really work reliably for most "rich" web apps , which are more and more common. (I
by pfg 10y ago
The problem with that solution is, at least in my experience, that it doesn't really work reliably for most "rich" web apps , which are more and more common. (I understand that this is a controversial topic in its own light.)
I can understand where they're coming from, and I'd be fine with a browser extension. Hopefully the one a Chrome developer is working on[1] will be available before this Chrome release hits stable.
[1]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=608016#c22 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=608016...
- Mithaldu 10y agoSadly implementing it as an extension is a security issue, as mentioned elsewhere plenty.
- pfg 10y agoI seem to have read this as "that extension won't be a content script (i.e. require access to all websites, like the existing extension)" initially, but on second reading, that might not be the case (and might, in fact, not be possible at all with the current APIs). Not too happy about having to add that kind of extension unless it's released by some trusted publisher ...