3 ms·
There's he's talking more about paradigms that require or oppose mental representations that simulate the motion of a ball. The point there is that it's unneces
by panglott 10y ago
There's he's talking more about paradigms that require or oppose mental representations that simulate the motion of a ball. The point there is that it's unnecessary to have an internal mental representation simulating the motion of the ball in order to catch it.
- facepalm 10y agoThat's a funny way to claim brains are not like computers then. After all the usual argument is that computers have no internal representation of anything. Why would anybody demand that there has to be an internal mental representation of a ball to catch it?