3 ms·
I'm not saying anything about this particular person; just amused as to people's attitudes towards people who might be engaged in secret work on behalf of a gov
by dave2000 10y ago
I'm not saying anything about this particular person; just amused as to people's attitudes towards people who might be engaged in secret work on behalf of a government, as if detecting such a person is straightforward, or that people have "spy" on their passport, etc. If you look at the history of spying, leakers and double agents you can see people do it for all sorts of reasons; money, blackmail, belief that your country is doing something wrong or that you need to help your country defeat another country's ideology etc.
- mywittyname 10y agoI think the general consensus is that it doesn't matter whether or not he is some clandestine NSA agent because his paper is just a theoretical proof that is almost entirely removed from any implementations based on his work. If there is some fundamental flaw in his work, then it's likely to be discovered before RNGs based on this work come into wide-spread use. It would be much easier to just code a flaw into the actual implementations of RNGs based on this.