Acknowledged - I didn't shop around carefully for primary sources for my link. I think the overall point holds even if you drop it to 10%, though -- there's pr

Acknowledged - I didn't shop around carefully for primary sources for my link. I think the overall point holds even if you drop it to 10%, though -- there's probably 1% of overall water use to be trimmed through the more-effective residential cutbacks. (It's worth distinguishing between potable and non-potable water in these analyses, though, because from a municipal perspective, there are additional benefits to keeping a cap on potable water use.)