4 ms·
Respect you putting up. #1 Original. More importantly, I like it :) Game theory meets ideology. I reckon that an multi-agent based simulation model with enough
by igravious 10y ago
Respect you putting up.
#1 Original. More importantly, I like it :) Game theory meets ideology. I reckon that an multi-agent based simulation model with enough features could test your hypothesis. I think sociology will get there in about a decade. If you do this now you'll revolutionise a part of the field.
#2 Not original. Epistemological theories have this covered. Also, you're blurring or at least not making distinct different kinds of knowing. Check out phenomenology as well. Check out cognitive neuroscience. I know these are huge areas but you seriously think nobody has thought about this following on from McCullogh-Pitts? There's knowing how versus knowing that for a start. There's knowing facts versus intuitions. Inductive reasoning has been studied. Intuitionism is a thing.
#3 Not original. Cybernetics has this covered. Also, Your steps are far far far too general.
- fmoralesc 10y ago1 is not necessarily original. Filip Buekens et al have worked on a model that constructs social institutions as emerging from incentivization structures like those present in cooperative games. See for example J. P. Smit, Filip Buekens and Stan du Plessis (2011) "What is Money? An Alternative to Searle's Institutional Facts", Economics and Philosophy 27(1), pp 1 - 22, http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=7977007&jid=EAP&volumeId=27&issueId=01&aid=7977005 http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&...
- igravious 10y agoInteresting. Thanks. Along related lines (I think): Author Fleischmann, Anselm. Title A simple Luhmann economy market mechanisms that lead to the emergence of the economy as proposed by Niklas Luhmann are explored by agent based modelling Imprint Saarbrücken : VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, 2008. https://library.ucc.ie/record=b2094907 https://library.ucc.ie/record=b2094907