5 ms·
They could have just failed. Never produced a technology. Wasted a bunch of money and all would be fine. But messing up medical tests while you are "figuring it
by rcarrigan87 10y ago
They could have just failed. Never produced a technology. Wasted a bunch of money and all would be fine. But messing up medical tests while you are "figuring it out" is unacceptable.
- vonklaus 10y agoThat is fair. It stings the most because the medical industry is known for it's transparency and rigorous testig standards. The FDA, famous champion of public health, was able to successfully stop 23&me (information terrorists) from providing harmful information to their patients as well. It makes sense tha Theranos should be singled out and villified for the failure of one of their beta devices that was i active development. Obviously, lieing about it wasn't super cool, but again their product "figures out and produces medical tests" so messing up your product(or procedures involving it) is === messing up medical testing.
- Daneel_ 10y agoI would have said the opposite - that the healthcare industry is known for its lack of transparency, with big pharma being notorious for their obfuscation.
- vonklaus 10y agoi was being sarcastic. either way, given the threads discourse, moonshots seem to be a super unpopular idea except when google does it...
- davidhowlett 10y agoI also thought that you were being serious. There is a good reason people use explicit markers for sarcasm like: <sarcasm> </sarcasm> I encourage you to look up Poe's law