Clearly he consistently sided with Orcale thought all this case. And I think it's totally ok to consider that he's not independent and very subjective. But by

Clearly he consistently sided with Orcale thought all this case. And I think it's totally ok to consider that he's not independent and very subjective. But by following he's blog since a few years I often found very interesting insights about the trial. And i think it's important sometimes to be open to counterpoints. While he can be very irritating when he touts out loud that he was right against every other analyst... We should conceded that he was remarkably good at predicting the outcome of the appeal. And while i don't agree on him on every points I'm pretty sure that the ruling about copyrightability of API is a very good one and might one day prove beneficial to the FOSS community. People often tends to mix up concept like Free/OpenSource Software and don't really get why licensing published code (even under WTFPL) is very important to keep projects rolling. I give to Mueller that he's probably better than many to understand complexity's of theses matters. On the other side the linked article of this thread is a giant misinformation as it use the most dumb and old argument Oracle used in this trial even thought it already have been ruled out years ago. EDIT: On a side note, I personally use PostgreSQL daily and wont recommend OracleDB to anyone as of nowadays.