I do not say that there is another side, this is what the article proposes. Also, there is a difference between engaging with someone in a constructive discussi

I do not say that there is another side, this is what the article proposes. Also, there is a difference between engaging with someone in a constructive discussion and just ranting against a funding decision. Has the author actually tried engaging with the people involved on the EU side or the researchers working on these systems? Also, saying that there is no involvement of the security research community in the development of these systems is almost certainly not true at least it would be very surprising to me.