2 ms·

I was also surprised to see this here. It needs a (2012) tag in the title at the very least, as this is not what is being litigated right now.

• justinclift 10y ago
  "tag" is apparently not the correct word. I was downvoted for using the same term to point out the same thing for another article recently. No idea what the "correct" word should be though.
  • logn 10y ago
    Maybe you weren't downvoted over the terminology. Putting the year in titles isn't required if it's an evergreen article (i.e., not news, not timely).
    • justinclift 10y ago
      Interesting, thanks that's something I hadn't considered.