3 ms·
For the most part that's true but any tiny difference is used against a group if it fits in some other group's argument. It's funny how Asian, Hispanic and Afri
by cm3 10y ago
For the most part that's true but any tiny difference is used against a group if it fits in some other group's argument. It's funny how Asian, Hispanic and African descendant people in the US are singled out while all the Irish, Italian and Jewish are only viewed separately on second inspection. I mean, if it's all white-looking people in a place, they differentiate Italians, Jews, Irish, etc., but before that it's the skin color (on level 1). I suppose this is some natural reaction homo sapiens has had for millions of years and not necessarily ill-meaning discrimination. Some anthropologist with more insight here?
- Kristine1975 10y ago>while all the Irish, Italian and Jewish are only viewed separately on second inspection That used to be different in the past, though, e.g: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Italianism#Anti-Italianism_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Italianism#Anti-Italianis...
- cm3 10y agoYes, and given their cultural background and looks they mixed in more quickly than other branches. Anytime I discuss this, I'm amazed by the way Britain has integrated their African population and to some extent Indian and Pakistani as well. Though, I'm not an expert on the British mainland demographics and culture and I may miss the finer points.