2 ms·
I think sci-hub is wonderful. However even widespread adoption by students and academics won't necessarily cut into publishers profits. "Gold Open Access" and
by padraic7a 10y ago
I think sci-hub is wonderful. However even widespread adoption by students and academics won't necessarily cut into publishers profits.
"Gold Open Access" and so-called hybrid journals will still make money off academics who have to publish in them for status / tenure / just to get a job.
Elsevier etc could transition to make all their money off author / grant agency / institution pays type charges.
The solution[s] to this are things like Green OA journals, library led publishing projects like 'Open Library of Humanities' [1] and piracy / liberation at the point of consumption.
https://www.openlibhums.org/ https://www.openlibhums.org/
- mst 10y agoIf Elsevier can find a way to provide open access and still make money, more power to them. I think, basically, "free the science from the publishers" and "free the scientists from the publishers" are two different goals and it's totally fine if sci-hub only fixes the first one.