I don't think they're saying incorrect data couldn't prove harm, they are saying that it hasn't yet produced concrete harm, which is really another way of say s

I don't think they're saying incorrect data couldn't prove harm, they are saying that it hasn't yet produced concrete harm, which is really another way of say strong evidence of harm. Obviously I disagree, especially when living in an age where teenagers aren't afraid to try and get a swat team to kick down your door because they don't like your YouTube channel. Privacy is very important.