Just consider that some individuals who have concerns with GMO's are not scientist themselves, but are referring to information that they have identified as a v

Just consider that some individuals who have concerns with GMO's are not scientist themselves, but are referring to information that they have identified as a vetted scientific source. Which may or may not be true. So, from their perspective, it is a science argument. Labeling their argument as anti-science is condescending in that it is received as a statement they are either not educated, have phobias of technology or their position comes from some religious or philosophical belief. We also have to recognize that we often get things wrong and that's why in a free society people are free to choose what they consume and should have knowledge of what is in a product. http://www.investors.com/politics/capital-hill/how-settled-science-caused-a-massive-public-health-crisis/ http://www.investors.com/politics/capital-hill/how-settled-s... The elephant in the room with vaccines is a credibility problem within the industry. Until that is addressed, doubt the dialog is going to improve. Whether the following are all true or not is irrelevant, these articles represent the lost of public trust which I believe is at the root of the problem that is never discussed. https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/articles/vioxx/vioxx-preemption-01011.html#.Vlx2HueLT9I https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/articles/vioxx/vioxx-p... At 6:30, mentions over 132,000 lawsuits filed against industry. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ch5OuzB9L48&feature=youtu.be&t=387 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ch5OuzB9L48&feature=youtu.be... Vaccines protected from lawsuits http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/March-2011/No-Pharma-Liability--No-Vaccine-Mandates-.aspx http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/March-2011/No-Pharma-L...