3 ms·
Need is a hazy thing. They will meet all of what they define as your need, but what you "can pay" often means a substantial sacrifice when it comes to standard
by jackowayed 17y ago
Need is a hazy thing. They will meet all of what they define as your need, but what you "can pay" often means a substantial sacrifice when it comes to standard of living. This is especially bad if your parents have been paying what they "can pay" for the last 4 years for an older sibling.
Also, it's gotten a lot better in the last few years, which is after he moved through Harvard.
About 3(?) years ago, they, along with a few other upper-echelon colleges (I know Stanford did) moved to a much more liberal definition of need and totally got rid of loans from financial aid programs. Now, theoretically, if your family makes <$60k, you pay nothing, and <$100k you pay no tuition, but pay room & board and such. There's more variables than just family income, and you always have to add to the "nothing" or the "no tuition" a reasonable figure for the student to make from having a part-time job during the year and full-time over the summer, but it's still substantially more generous than it was.
It would be interesting to see if those policies changed the percentage that are only children.
- jessriedel 17y agoThat's quite a liberal definition of "need".
- jackowayed 17y agoYes, it is. It used to be substantially worse, though, and other than a few top colleges, it still is. Example of the difference: my "estimated family contribution" according to the FAFSA is about $10k more than what Stanford estimates they'll make me pay (though I haven't seen the final number, yet).