3 ms·
A case built on circumstantial evidence is the very definition of reasonable doubt and should be tossed out! I don't understand why so many people think the pu
by tsunamifury 10y ago
A case built on circumstantial evidence is the very definition of reasonable doubt and should be tossed out! I don't understand why so many people think the purpose of court is to convict people! You're question could litterally be reduced to "But how are we supposed to find them guilty if we don't have evidence?"
- duaneb 10y agoUltimately, what is "reasonable doubt" is up to the jury. I can't say I agree with the use of circumstantial evidence, but that's how the court works. Additionally, many people do get off based on lack of clear evidence?