36 ms·
No but a human thought does not represent a numeric operator, it represents a very very complex state. It would take megabytes probably even perhaps gigabytes t
by callesgg 10y ago
No but a human thought does not represent a numeric operator, it represents a very very complex state.
It would take megabytes probably even perhaps gigabytes to represent a thought on some level.
- teraflop 10y agoIt takes an awful lot of data to fully capture the instantaneous state of a superscalar processor, too. Instruction scheduling, register renaming, cache lookups, branch prediction, speculative execution, and so on.