3 ms·
<Put housing above supermarkets! Offices inside apartment complexes!> Sure, that's the ideal and gradually becoming more common. (Heck, the Two Worlds developm
by DrScump 11y ago
<Put housing above supermarkets! Offices inside apartment complexes!>
Sure, that's the ideal and gradually becoming more common. (Heck, the Two Worlds development in Mountain View -- ground-level retail with residences above -- dates to the 1980s.)
But again, the trick is figuring out a way to force people to only take jobs within their building and/or move to the building where their job is (and move both when either changes). It just doesn't work that way in the Real World.
- rtpg 11y agobut empirically it works in many other cities in the Real World. Something something Europe Japan. I stated this but if you ask most people whether they'd want their office to be moved close to their house, I imagine most people would want their office to be close by. And people are willing to pay a premium for this. Even if they don't take jobs in their building, at the very least this will cause other people in nearby residential zones to be closer to other jobs. Of course people will still use cars (and traffic will probably suck! But that's what you get for driving). But you'll reduce how much people need to drive.